<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transcend 600x CF Cards: The Real Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/</link>
	<description>Reviews, Technique, Portfolio, Prints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-2843</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-2843</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t been able to find any yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t been able to find any yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor Levicki</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Levicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>Have you by any chance tested Apacer 600x cards from the Photo Steno IV series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you by any chance tested Apacer 600x cards from the Photo Steno IV series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>No &#039;people&#039; - just one &#039;guy.&#039;  :)  And I know the camera can write the data that fast because...well, that&#039;s what I&#039;m using to write the data.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8216;people&#8217; &#8211; just one &#8216;guy.&#8217;  <img src='http://sportsphotoguy.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   And I know the camera can write the data that fast because&#8230;well, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m using to write the data.  <img src='http://sportsphotoguy.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>Well how do you ppl know that the Cameras can actually write that much data in the first place. 

Has Nikon stated it somewhere or not ?

I need read speed for video workflow .. most cards are fast enough for the write part for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well how do you ppl know that the Cameras can actually write that much data in the first place. </p>
<p>Has Nikon stated it somewhere or not ?</p>
<p>I need read speed for video workflow .. most cards are fast enough for the write part for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;There are any number of settings that will reduce your buffer depth, and at 6-8 fps, you will eventually fill your buffer (shooting raw).  If you&#039;re using Active D-Lighting, ISO Auto Sensitivity Control, either form of noise reduction, ISO above 3200, or Image Authentication, you&#039;re going to reduce buffer depth.
&lt;P&gt;See the chart in the manual on p. 402, and especially the notes on p. 403, for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are any number of settings that will reduce your buffer depth, and at 6-8 fps, you will eventually fill your buffer (shooting raw).  If you&#8217;re using Active D-Lighting, ISO Auto Sensitivity Control, either form of noise reduction, ISO above 3200, or Image Authentication, you&#8217;re going to reduce buffer depth.
</p>
<p>See the chart in the manual on p. 402, and especially the notes on p. 403, for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photodom</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Photodom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>How many frames do you manage get in a burst before the buffer fills up on the D300? 

I can only get 13-15 frames before it freeze. This is about the same as my D700. In crop mode on my D2X I can get between 24-26 frames before if stops, but I&#039;ve never been happy with the loss in quality doing this.  I shoot Raw and Small Jpeg. The reason I want a reasonable burst is that I use Proshow Gold for wedding proofs and add a little chapter called Movie Extras (confeti, b&amp;g walking, dancing etc.) This goes down well but you need at least 24 frames to make it look reasonable. FYI each photo is on screen for only0.20 seconds with 0.00 transition time between each frame. Also, I have heard various stories about Transcend reliability. Do you have any info on that. I use a mix if Sandisk, Lexar and I-Pro 4gb cards and have had no reliability issues so far. The only thing I have ever had fail on me was a Microdrive - just after I&#039;d finished downloading the pics. I know you haven&#039;t tested the 16gb card, but would you expect any difference in wright times?

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many frames do you manage get in a burst before the buffer fills up on the D300? </p>
<p>I can only get 13-15 frames before it freeze. This is about the same as my D700. In crop mode on my D2X I can get between 24-26 frames before if stops, but I&#8217;ve never been happy with the loss in quality doing this.  I shoot Raw and Small Jpeg. The reason I want a reasonable burst is that I use Proshow Gold for wedding proofs and add a little chapter called Movie Extras (confeti, b&amp;g walking, dancing etc.) This goes down well but you need at least 24 frames to make it look reasonable. FYI each photo is on screen for only0.20 seconds with 0.00 transition time between each frame. Also, I have heard various stories about Transcend reliability. Do you have any info on that. I use a mix if Sandisk, Lexar and I-Pro 4gb cards and have had no reliability issues so far. The only thing I have ever had fail on me was a Microdrive &#8211; just after I&#8217;d finished downloading the pics. I know you haven&#8217;t tested the 16gb card, but would you expect any difference in wright times?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>What program do you shoot with?  :)  I don&#039;t shoot with a piece of software either; so I test the cards in-camera, without so-called testing software.  Not much point in using a program designed to benchmark hard drives on a computer to see what a card will do when shooting photos.  That&#039;s one of the problems I have with a number of so-called &quot;test&quot; sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What program do you shoot with?  <img src='http://sportsphotoguy.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I don&#8217;t shoot with a piece of software either; so I test the cards in-camera, without so-called testing software.  Not much point in using a program designed to benchmark hard drives on a computer to see what a card will do when shooting photos.  That&#8217;s one of the problems I have with a number of so-called &#8220;test&#8221; sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thai</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/transcend-600x-cf-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Thai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=619#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>How did you test it? What program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you test it? What program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

