Our results are pretty consistent.
In most cases, our order-of-finish tracked each other, with my results almost universally 1-3 MB/s higher than his. He shot 10 images per test, while I shot 15; he didn’t specify his on-camera settings, but more than likely with just 10 images he never filled the buffer, as my test is designed to do. Galbraith also does not calculate anything approaching an “effective FPS rate” as I do for the D7000 RAW Burst Test; however, he also tests JPG write speed plus a consecutive NEF+JPG burst recording capability (similar to my JPG test for the D300).







2 responses so far ↓
1 Eric // Apr 29, 2012 at 5:44 AM
Thanks for the useful job
2 Andrew // Oct 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM
Always good to have more than one person testing. Even if the results are somewhat different.
Not having to write the extra data for the JPEG is more likely the difference.
But from either test it does show there is a difference between the speed of the cards.
Leave a Comment