<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Look: Sigma 50/f1.4 EX DG HSM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsphotoguy.com/quick-look-sigma-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/quick-look-sigma-50/</link>
	<description>Reviews, Technique, Portfolio, Prints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/quick-look-sigma-50/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=202#comment-533</guid>
		<description>interesting comparo....I&#039;m eagerly awaiting tests on the Nikon.  I need AFS/HSM in this focal length for indoor sports where I don&#039;t use flash/strobe.  The Nikon 50 (and 35/f2) just can&#039;t keep up w/ basketball, esp in the paint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting comparo&#8230;.I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting tests on the Nikon.  I need AFS/HSM in this focal length for indoor sports where I don&#8217;t use flash/strobe.  The Nikon 50 (and 35/f2) just can&#8217;t keep up w/ basketball, esp in the paint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

