<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Portfolio for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/</link>
	<description>Reviews, Technique, Portfolio, Prints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Yep, 85/f1.8.  Still have it, but it has terrible CA compared to more modern glass.  Nikon needs to re-release it with an ED element or two to bring it up to date, and AF-S of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, 85/f1.8.  Still have it, but it has terrible CA compared to more modern glass.  Nikon needs to re-release it with an ED element or two to bring it up to date, and AF-S of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Perfect now.  Easy to navigate.  Nice large thumbnails.  Attractive fade into larger pictures.  Oh yeah - and some awesome from the goal post and above the goal post action for basketball.  I noticed that 85mm f/2.0 was indicated on some shots.  An 85 mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 must have been in your old camera bag arsenal.  Nice shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect now.  Easy to navigate.  Nice large thumbnails.  Attractive fade into larger pictures.  Oh yeah &#8211; and some awesome from the goal post and above the goal post action for basketball.  I noticed that 85mm f/2.0 was indicated on some shots.  An 85 mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 must have been in your old camera bag arsenal.  Nice shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Much cleaner and easier to navigate.  Is there any way to have the navigation part of the frame (upper right, left/right arrow, &quot;X&quot;, etc) remain static?  If I&#039;m scrolling thru the images, I like to just click my mouse button.  But when the pix change from landscape to portrait, I have to move as the picture position changes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much cleaner and easier to navigate.  Is there any way to have the navigation part of the frame (upper right, left/right arrow, &#8220;X&#8221;, etc) remain static?  If I&#8217;m scrolling thru the images, I like to just click my mouse button.  But when the pix change from landscape to portrait, I have to move as the picture position changes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Tried a more conventional approach - I think this works much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried a more conventional approach &#8211; I think this works much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-784</guid>
		<description>The new pictures really show sports photography at it&#039;s best.  I agree, remove the tilt feature.  I really would like to isolate a picture by clicking on it to see it framed by itself.  Then a normal click through slide show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new pictures really show sports photography at it&#8217;s best.  I agree, remove the tilt feature.  I really would like to isolate a picture by clicking on it to see it framed by itself.  Then a normal click through slide show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-783</guid>
		<description>I wondered if that was more of an annoying gimmick than an artistic feature.  I&#039;m continuing to work on it.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if that was more of an annoying gimmick than an artistic feature.  I&#8217;m continuing to work on it.  <img src='http://sportsphotoguy.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-portfolio-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=394#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Some nice pics in the portfolio. However, can&#039;t say I&#039;m enamored w/ the tilt viewer.

As I was navigating (large images) left to right &amp; vice-versa, I couldn&#039;t go vertically, until I was at the end of a row, and even then, it wasn&#039;t easy.  And, I wasn&#039;t initially aware that I could &#039;flatten&#039; the image instead of having viewing it at an angle, which wasn&#039;t ideal.

It was only by accident that I clicked outside the images to shrink them back to the thumbnail to discover it was easier to navigate the images.   But I have a headache ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some nice pics in the portfolio. However, can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m enamored w/ the tilt viewer.</p>
<p>As I was navigating (large images) left to right &amp; vice-versa, I couldn&#8217;t go vertically, until I was at the end of a row, and even then, it wasn&#8217;t easy.  And, I wasn&#8217;t initially aware that I could &#8216;flatten&#8217; the image instead of having viewing it at an angle, which wasn&#8217;t ideal.</p>
<p>It was only by accident that I clicked outside the images to shrink them back to the thumbnail to discover it was easier to navigate the images.   But I have a headache <img src='http://sportsphotoguy.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

