http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-nikkors-24f1-4-and-16-35f4/ Reviews, Technique, Portfolio, Prints Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:35:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-nikkors-24f1-4-and-16-35f4/comment-page-1/#comment-2915 Bruce Wed, 19 May 2010 15:31:02 +0000 http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=713#comment-2915 Really! The gap between Nikon's pro glass and their "regular" glass is incredible, especially considering the narrowing difference in quality. On the other hand, there's a big difference between a full-frame 24 and a DX-sized 30, that's for sure. I guess if you're paying $5000-$8,000 for your D3-series body, that 24/1.4 doesn't seem so expensive. Really! The gap between Nikon’s pro glass and their “regular” glass is incredible, especially considering the narrowing difference in quality. On the other hand, there’s a big difference between a full-frame 24 and a DX-sized 30, that’s for sure. I guess if you’re paying $5000-$8,000 for your D3-series body, that 24/1.4 doesn’t seem so expensive.

]]> http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-nikkors-24f1-4-and-16-35f4/comment-page-1/#comment-2436 Steve Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:56:20 +0000 http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=713#comment-2436 LOL. Well it is true, the FX lenses are amazing. Despite the weird focal length on the D300, the 24-70 f/2.8 fx never leaves my camera. But 2Gs for a fixed focal length is a little much for me. I am thinking of saving for the new f/2.8 300 mm for sports and wildlife. LOL. Well it is true, the FX lenses are amazing. Despite the weird focal length on the D300, the 24-70 f/2.8 fx never leaves my camera. But 2Gs for a fixed focal length is a little much for me. I am thinking of saving for the new f/2.8 300 mm for sports and wildlife.

]]> http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-nikkors-24f1-4-and-16-35f4/comment-page-1/#comment-2435 The Sports Photo Guy Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:40:45 +0000 http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=713#comment-2435 Really! The gap between Nikon's pro glass and their "regular" glass is incredible, especially considering the narrowing difference in quality. On the other hand, there's a big difference between a full-frame 24 and a DX-sized 30, that's for sure. I guess if you're paying $5000-$8,000 for your D3-series body, that 24/1.4 doesn't seem so expensive. Really! The gap between Nikon’s pro glass and their “regular” glass is incredible, especially considering the narrowing difference in quality. On the other hand, there’s a big difference between a full-frame 24 and a DX-sized 30, that’s for sure. I guess if you’re paying $5000-$8,000 for your D3-series body, that 24/1.4 doesn’t seem so expensive.

]]> http://sportsphotoguy.com/new-nikkors-24f1-4-and-16-35f4/comment-page-1/#comment-2434 Steve Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:24:29 +0000 http://sportsphotoguy.com/?p=713#comment-2434 Oye. I think I will be getting the Sigma 30 mm for my D300. I miss Chinese prices. Oye. I think I will be getting the Sigma 30 mm for my D300. I miss Chinese prices.

]]>