Tokina’s new ultra-wide is fast, sharp, and the only game in town at this range and speed.
Announced in January, Tokina’s new fast ultra-wide for APS-C DSLRs has begun shipping to U.S. customers. Mine arrived yesterday, and I took it out for a few shots today. So far, I like what I see very much!
Buy the Tokina 11-16/f2.8 ATX Pro DX Aspherical for Nikon
Buy the Tokina 11-16/f2.8 ATX Pro DX Aspherical for Canon
Background. We all know the trade-offs of the APS-C DSLR. With its “lens conversion factor” (focal length multiplier) of anywhere from 1.3-1.7, one of the biggest has been the loss of true ultra-wide capability (16-20mm in 35mm focal length equivalent). While slow (constant f4 or variable-aperture designs from f4-f4.5 on up) zooms in the 12-24mm range are now widely available (even dipping down to 10mm or 11mm on the wide end), those of us looking for an equivalent to the 35mm 17-35/f2.8 lens have had to make do without, until now. Tokina has taken their highly-regarded 12-24/f4 lens and modified the design to produce an 11-16/f2.8 lens for Nikon and Canon mounts.
Update: 6/22/2008. Got a chance to try the lens out fitted with a slim Cokin P filter holder and circular polarizer. Unfortunately, this combination vignettes significantly at 11 and 12mm. See photo toward end of article.
Update: 7/6/2008. Took a look at distortion, and summarized my observations in a separate article. In short, the lens exhibits barrel distortion if you look for it, but it is uniform and fairly easily corrected.

Washington & Lee University. 11mm, 1/160 @ f11, ISO 200.
Specifications. According to the Tokina web site:
| Focal Length: | 11~16mm |
| Maximum Aperture: | F/2.8 |
| Minimum Aperture: | F/22 |
| Construction: | 13 elements in 11 groups. |
| Coatings: | Multi-layer |
| Angle of View: | 104°~82° |
| Minimum Focus Distance: | 0.3m |
| Reproduction Ratio: | 1:11.6 |
| Focusing Mode: | Internal Focusing |
| Zoom Mode: | Rotary Zoom |
| No. Aperture blades: | 9 |
| Filter Size: | 77mm |
| Lens width: | 84mm |
| Lens length: | 89.2mm |
| Weight:: | 560g |
| Accessories: | Flower design Bayonet lens hood(BH77A) |
| Mount Availability: | Canon and Nikon APS-C |
Handling. The lens is made to Tokina’s tried-and-true standards, which I call “deceptively well-built.” The lens does feel solid, but I know from experience that Tokian’s lenses are not quite as well built as they seem. (I’ve seen a malfunctioning 20-35/f2.8 lens taken apart and repaired by replacing the electrical tape that was used by Tokina to hold key components together!) In practice, however, Tokina’s lenses hold up to typical use fairly well.

Ultrawide Creativity. 11mm, 1/400 @ f8, ISO 200.
Finish and markings are also typical Tokina, highly functional if somewhat 70’s-looking. The included, petal-shaped plastic lens hood fits securely enough, and a new “pinch” lens cap design is an improvement. The lens has a filter size of 77mm and it appears that even polarizing filters can be used with the lens hood in place (albeit with some difficulty). The lens does not have an internal focus motor, though it sports Tokina’s auto-manual focus clutch. Manual focusing is well-damped and fairly smooth, though with only a very short throw of just under a quarter turn from infinity to the minimum focus distance of about a foot.
Auto-focusing is of the internal type, and typical for an ultra-wide is very quick. For sports photographers, this lens has great potential for remote mounting behind a basketball backboard or inside a soccer or lacrosse goal. With the end of the college sports season, I probably won’t have a chance to try out any of these applications until fall.

Lee Chapel. 11mm, 1/2500 @ f2.8, ISO 200.
Performance. From a handful of initial shots, this is typical Tokina glass: very sharp and reasonably contrasty, not quite up to Nikon standards but quite acceptable for professional use. Sharpness at f2.8 is not bad at all, with a “sweet spot” of between f5.6-f11 at 11mm.
Bokeh leaves a bit to be desired, even with the 9-blade diaphragm, although this is not surprising for such a wide lens.
Distortion is also quite reasonably controlled, with barely perceptible barrel distortion visible at 11mm. At such a wide focal length, however, distortion is most noticeable in the compression of perspective typical of ultrawide lenses.

Bokeh. 16mm, 1/2500 @ f2.8, ISO 200.
Infrared. Infrared capability seems fine, from a few sample shots taken with my D70i. There is no IR focus mark, although at such a wide angle there’s likely to be little need for one.

Virginia Horse Country. D70i, 16mm, 1/320 @ f10, ISO 200.
Vignetting w/filters. With the Cokin P system, utilizing the “slim” one-filter holder, the lens vignettes noticeably at 11mm and 12mm (the shot below is at 11mm).



10 responses so far ↓
1 Mark // Jun 7, 2008 at 8:22 pm
How does this lens compare to the Sigma 10-20mm for Nikon? The Sigma goes 1mm wider, doesn’t go to f2.8, uses an AF-S type focus system, and costs about the same.
2 The Sports Photo Guy // Jun 7, 2008 at 10:13 pm
I have not used the Sigma 10-20, but a constant f2.8 lens such as the Tokina, IMO, is far more useful than a slower lens that has a nominally wider zoom range. I will be posting some comparison images to the excellent Sigma 12-24/f4.5-5.6 which I use extensively.
3 Raygun // Jun 8, 2008 at 9:36 am
What kind of sharpening did you do on the last image of the flower? Or was that just a tight crop? There seems to be some edge-effects going on. Otherwise, on the other photos, the large depth of field, lack of CA, and sharpness seem very nice.
4 The Sports Photo Guy // Jun 8, 2008 at 10:32 am
The last image is a 100% crop, so you’re looking at a larger magnification than the other images. This isn’t exactly a macro lens, so fine details in flowers isn’t going to be its forte.
5 twig // Jun 13, 2008 at 8:45 pm
I look forward to your comparisons to the Sigma 12-24., which I also use extensively and find to be an amazing performer.
6 Mark // Jul 3, 2008 at 1:42 pm
I just got this lens and I need some grad ND filters. Your photo clearly shows vignetting with the cokin P series filter. Have you tried a Z series or Z-pro cokin filter to avoid vignetting? I am not sure which size to buy.
7 The Sports Photo Guy // Jul 6, 2008 at 4:12 pm
I have not tried the larger Cokin filters. Standard 77mm filters (one at a time), however, don’t appear to cause problems, though I don’t have a thicker, rotating filter such as a grad or polarizer in that size to try out.
8 Canon SLR Lense Recommendation - Tyresmoke Forums // Sep 7, 2008 at 11:30 am
[...] a Nikon heathen here, but I’m looking at this thing right now, which also comes in Canon fit: First Look: Tokina 11-16/f2.8 AT-X Pro DX It’s either that (fast-ish at f/2.8, if not up to gizze’s specs) or the Sigma mentioned above, [...]
9 Gressler // Nov 11, 2008 at 8:04 am
Hi Chuck,
Have you rotated the Cokin filter in vignetting photo? About 30 degrees ?
10 The Sports Photo Guy // Nov 11, 2008 at 8:48 am
If I recall I rotated the filter, but not the filter holder; however, I don’t remember for certain.
Leave a Comment