<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camera Bag: Basketball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/</link>
	<description>Reviews, Technique, Portfolio, Prints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Based on the sample image you sent to me, the camera isn&#039;t really the problem, it&#039;s the light and to some extent the lens.  With your only being able to achieve 1/50 a second shutter speed at f2.8 and ISO 800, you really need a full 2-3 stops more light.  Boosting to ISO 1600 probably won&#039;t be enough.  You can get useable shots at ISO 3200 on a D300, but a cheaper alternative might be an f1.8 or f1.4 prime such as a 50/f1.4 or 85/f1.8.  These days I am really liking Sigma&#039;s 50/f1.4, though I have not tried the new AF-S Nikon 50/f1.4 (I&#039;ve got one on backorder).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the sample image you sent to me, the camera isn&#8217;t really the problem, it&#8217;s the light and to some extent the lens.  With your only being able to achieve 1/50 a second shutter speed at f2.8 and ISO 800, you really need a full 2-3 stops more light.  Boosting to ISO 1600 probably won&#8217;t be enough.  You can get useable shots at ISO 3200 on a D300, but a cheaper alternative might be an f1.8 or f1.4 prime such as a 50/f1.4 or 85/f1.8.  These days I am really liking Sigma&#8217;s 50/f1.4, though I have not tried the new AF-S Nikon 50/f1.4 (I&#8217;ve got one on backorder).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>I shoot high school baseball, basketball, and softball with a Nikon D80 and a Nikkon 70-200 f/2.8. But most of my shots are coming our blurry what do you think I should do to fix this. I am thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D300 but I am waiting to see if the price will come down. WHAT SHOULD I DO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot high school baseball, basketball, and softball with a Nikon D80 and a Nikkon 70-200 f/2.8. But most of my shots are coming our blurry what do you think I should do to fix this. I am thinking about upgrading to the Nikon D300 but I am waiting to see if the price will come down. WHAT SHOULD I DO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sports Photo Guy</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sports Photo Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>The 80-200/f2.8 is certainly fast enough with strobes.  In fact, with a top flash sync speed of just 1/250 as most Nikons have now, you will probably have to dial down those 1600&#039;s in most instances.

With a D300 or D3, f2.8 should be plenty fast enough since you have up to ISO 3200 for useable results.

On an APS-C sensor (Nikon DX), 80-200 is just a bit long for basketball; I use this combo mostly for half-court or opposite end shots.  On a film or full-frame (Nikon FX) sensor, 80-200 is about perfect from most anywhere on the near end of the court, although it can be a bit tight under the basket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 80-200/f2.8 is certainly fast enough with strobes.  In fact, with a top flash sync speed of just 1/250 as most Nikons have now, you will probably have to dial down those 1600&#8242;s in most instances.</p>
<p>With a D300 or D3, f2.8 should be plenty fast enough since you have up to ISO 3200 for useable results.</p>
<p>On an APS-C sensor (Nikon DX), 80-200 is just a bit long for basketball; I use this combo mostly for half-court or opposite end shots.  On a film or full-frame (Nikon FX) sensor, 80-200 is about perfect from most anywhere on the near end of the court, although it can be a bit tight under the basket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Sauk</title>
		<link>http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sauk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsphotoguy.com/camera-bag-basketball/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I use nikon gear and I am wondering what your thoughts are on the 80-200 afs lens. Is it fast enough for bball in bad lighting?

Should I go with something else or in your opinion will it be fine? 

I should also add I will be using AlienBee B1600&#039;s for strobes.


Thanks,

Matthew Sauk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use nikon gear and I am wondering what your thoughts are on the 80-200 afs lens. Is it fast enough for bball in bad lighting?</p>
<p>Should I go with something else or in your opinion will it be fine? </p>
<p>I should also add I will be using AlienBee B1600&#8242;s for strobes.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Matthew Sauk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

